Articles
           || Home ||


Coimbatore
Tirupur
Articles
Construction Costs Coimbatore
House Loans




Designing quake-resistant buildings

The common man is under-informed and under-educated on earthquake resistant design

ABOUT 60 per cent of India's land area is under the threat of moderate to severe seismic hazard. Nine earthquakes in the Indian tectonic region over the past 17 years have provided constant reminders of the vulnerability of Indian construction. It was the Bhuj earthquake of 2001 that stirred-up maximum concern on the vulnerability of Indian constructions, particularly the modern reinforced cement concrete (RCC) constructions.

The Indian public is under-informed and under-educated on earthquake resistant design and construction. This paper highlights the seismic vulnerability of the large number of a class of reinforced concrete multi-storey buildings being constructed in the urban areas. . These buildings have open ground storey to accommodate parking and 230 mm size columns in the ground storey. The typical RCC buildings in India are made of frames consisting of vertical and horizontal members. The former are called columns while the latter members consist of (a) slabs, that is, the flat, plate-like parts of the building on which people stand, walk and conduct themselves in the building and (b) beams, that is, the stiff, rib-like parts of the building running under the slab but between columns which support the slabs.

Stilt structures
The typical buildings being built in India accommodate parking in the ground storey. Most buildings having parking in the ground storey have no masonry walls built between any columns. While having parking in the ground storey is not the concern, having all masonry walls removed and leaving the columns bare is the crux of the matter.

Many unprofessional players in the real estate development industry are doling out substandard civil engineering products. and exploiting the ignorance of the common man on many technical aspects of civil engineering. For example, most RCC frame buildings in the present context use the same 230mm(9-inch) wide columns in them irrespective of the number of storeys they support above them. This article focuses only on one aspect of the oft-constructed RCC buildings, namely the use of 230 mm wide columns. .

A stark feature of these columns and also the most unsafe aspect of the buildings they hold is that their size is fixed- 230 mm. Irrespective of the overall height of the building (1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 14 or even 21 storeys), the location of the building (in severe seismic zone or in low seismic zone), the type of soil strata underneath the building (soft soil or hard rock) and the distance between adjacent columns (2m, 3m, 4m or even 5m), the column size is unbelievably the same- 230 mm. The person who built your apartment may not necessarily be qualified to make earthquake resistant buildings. Open ground storey buildings have consistently shown poor performance during past earthquakes across the world; a large number of them have collapsed.

The presence of walls in upper storeys makes them many times stiffer than the open ground storey. Thus, the upper storeys move almost together as a single block and most of the horizontal displacement of the building occurs in the soft ground storey itself. There are several features associated with the open ground storey buildings with 230 mm wide columns that make them vulnerable during earthquakes. The vertical members in buildings support the horizontal members. So vertical members must be stronger than the horizontal ones. But open ground storey buildings on 230 mm wide columns do not have the feature of strong column-weak beam. Usually, beams are deeper than the columns, have the same width as the columns but have more steel than the beams. This makes them stronger than the columns.

After the Bhuj earthquake, the Indian Seismic Code IS: 1893 (Part 1) - 2002 has included special design provisions.

First, it specifies when a building becomes soft or weak. Second, it specifies higher design forces for the soft storey. For all new RCC frame buildings, the best option is not to have such sudden and large decrease in the stiffness and/or strength in any storey of a building; it would be ideal to have walls (either masonry or RC walls) in the ground storey also.

(THE AUTHOR IS PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY


The Hindu - Property Plus - Sunday, June 11, 2006
Untitled Document
|| Back || Home ||